Finding the right lawyer is not another complication.


Helping You Get Results



The Implications of Pre-existing Conditions in Colorado Workers’ Compensation Cases

Workers’ compensation cases in Colorado can be complex, particularly when pre-existing conditions are involved. Having a clear understanding of the implications of pre-existing conditions is crucial for both employers and employees. This ensures fair and just outcomes in workers’ compensation cases. In this guide, we will explore all aspects of pre-existing conditions within the context of Colorado’s workers’ compensation system.

Pre-existing Conditions

Defining Pre-existing Conditions

A pre-existing condition refers to any injury, illness, or medical condition that an employee had before their work-related incident. In Colorado, workers’ compensation laws recognize that pre-existing conditions can impact the severity of a workplace injury or illness. It is essential for both employers and employees to be aware of how pre-existing conditions may influence the outcome of a workers’ compensation claim.

Impact on Eligibility for Benefits

One of the primary concerns in workers’ compensation cases involving pre-existing conditions is how they may affect eligibility for benefits. Colorado law acknowledges that aggravation or exacerbation of pre-existing conditions in the workplace is compensable. However, determining the extent of aggravation and its relationship to the workplace incident can be a daunting task.

Employees must demonstrate that the work-related incident significantly worsened their pre-existing condition or caused a new injury. On the other hand, employers may dispute the extent to which the pre-existing condition was affected by the workplace incident. Seeking legal advice early in the process can help clarify these issues.

Apportionment of Benefits

Colorado follows the principle of apportionment when pre-existing conditions are present. This means that the workers’ compensation benefits awarded will be proportionate to the extent that the workplace incident contributed to the injury or aggravation of the pre-existing condition. Apportionment aims to ensure that only the portion of the injury directly related to the work-related incident is compensated.

It is crucial for both employees and employers to gather comprehensive medical evidence to support their respective positions on apportionment. Consulting with our experienced workers’ compensation attorney at The Law Offices of W. Dan Mahoney, P.C. can help you handle the challenges of apportionment and present a strong case.

Challenges in Proving Causation

Establishing a direct causal link between a workplace incident and the aggravation of a pre-existing condition is a critical aspect of workers’ compensation cases. The journey to proving causation is fraught with challenges that impact the whole process. Some of the common setbacks include;

  • Temporal challenges: One of the primary hurdles in proving causation is the temporal aspect. The time gap between the workplace incident and the aggravation of the pre-existing condition can be a point of contention. Employers may argue that the condition’s worsening is coincidental or unrelated to the incident, while employees need to establish a clear timeline linking the two.
  • Pre-existing condition complexity: Some conditions may have multiple causes and make it challenging to isolate the workplace incident as the primary factor. Distinguishing between the natural progression of a pre-existing condition and the impact of the workplace incident demands thorough medical analysis.
  • Lack of medical documentation: Insufficient or incomplete medical documentation can pose a significant challenge. In some instances, medical records may not adequately capture the pre-existing condition’s baseline. As a result, it becomes challenging to demonstrate the extent of aggravation.
  • Adverse medical opinions: The interpretation of medical evidence is subjective, and differing medical opinions can arise. Employers may present their medical experts who dispute the causal link, leading to conflicting views on the case.

The Need for an Attorney

Given the complex nature of workers’ compensation cases involving pre-existing conditions, seeking legal representation is highly advisable. Experienced workers’ compensation attorneys can assess the specific circumstances of a case and provide guidance on gathering relevant evidence.

At the Law Offices of W. Dan Mahoney, P.C., we are dedicated to assisting clients in maneuvering the ups and downs of workers’ compensation cases. Here are some of the ways we can help you;

  • Our attorneys provide expert guidance on navigating the complexities of workers’ compensation laws in Colorado.
  • We offer strategic advice to build a strong evidentiary foundation, especially in cases involving pre-existing conditions.
  • Our legal team assists in gathering comprehensive medical evidence to support your workers’ compensation claim.
  • We advocate for your rights in disputes, particularly when employers challenge the causal link between a workplace incident and a pre-existing condition.
  • The Law Offices of W. Dan Mahoney, P.C. ensures timely and effective legal intervention to secure fair outcomes and maximum benefits for our clients.

We are Ready to Help You Get Justice

Seeking timely legal advice and building a strong evidentiary foundation are crucial steps toward ensuring fair outcomes in workers’ compensation cases. Our team at The Law Offices of W. Dan Mahoney, P.C. is ready to assist individuals facing these challenges. Reach out to us today.